Tribunals · Dorset Council · 2017 rating list

9-10 ST THOMAS STREET, WEYMOUTH, DT4 8EW

Restaurant and premises Decided 22 November 2021 CHG100402085 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£34,750£350/m²
Ratepayer sought£25,750
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£34,750£350/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the property should be valued as a restaurant on an overall basis at £180/m2 (£25,750 RV), contending the mode of occupation had changed from retail to restaurant use. The tribunal found that although the property was occupied as a restaurant, its inherent character within a retail parade was that of a retail unit, and the substantial kitchen (installed after the material day) could easily be removed to revert to retail use. The tribunal placed greater weight on comparable properties within the retail parade valued at £350/m2, and noted the rental evidence was not sufficiently close to the antecedent valuation date. The appeal was dismissed and the original assessment of £34,750 RV was confirmed.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Parbat Catering Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Valuation method
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Scottish & Newcastle Retail Limited & Allied Domecq Retailing Limited v R F Williams; Williams v Scottish & Newcastle Retail Ltd
Hearing
28 October 2021

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.