Tribunals · City of Westminster · 2017 rating list

(& 1ST FLR STH 6-8), BST & GRD FLR 6, SACKVILLE STREET, W1S 3DD

Shop and premises Decided 22 March 2021 CHG100406058 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£96,500£1700/m²
Ratepayer sought£82,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£96,500£1700/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the property's rateable value of £96,500 (£1,700/m2) was excessive and should be reduced to £82,500 based on a passing rent agreed in December 2015. The tribunal found insufficient weight could be attached to the rental evidence as no lease documentation had been provided and no return had been submitted. The tribunal accepted comparable property evidence cited by the Valuation Officer, particularly Unit 26 Sackville Street which supported the £1,700/m2 valuation, and dismissed the appeal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Jones Chalk and Dawson, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents, comparable_assessments, Photographs
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
10 March 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Westminster · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.