Tribunals · Nottingham City Council · 2017 rating list

Tiger, Unit 318, NG1 3QN

Shop and premises Decided 4 July 2022 CHG100550631 Jones Lang LaSalle eu

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£115,000£1050/m²
Ratepayer sought£96,000
VO conceded first£104,000−10% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£104,000£950/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, a retail company occupying Unit 318 in Victoria Centre, argued that the rateable value should be reduced to £96,000 based on a zone A rate of £876/m2, contending that rental evidence from the subject property required minimal adjustment and that comparable property evidence should carry less weight. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the rental evidence of Unit 318 required significant adjustments including treatment of incentives and rent-free periods, making it unreliable, whereas the rental evidence of Unit 216 was more useful and supported the VO's adopted zone A rate of £950/m2.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Tiger UK Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
14 June 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in Nottingham City Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.