26 /28, TOWN SQUARE, SS14 1DT
Shop and premises Decided 27 January 2023 CHG100604819 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the rateable value of £37,750 (zone A rate of £500/m²) was unreasonable and proposed £30,000 based on a tone of £400/m². The appellant relied on rental evidence from the subject property (£427/m²) and comparable properties, particularly 7 Town Square (£304.95/m²), and argued for a 17% reduction in tone similar to other comparable properties. The tribunal found that the basket of comparable rental evidence provided by the Valuation Officer supported the existing assessment and that the appellant had not provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate the RV was excessive. The appeal was dismissed and the RV confirmed at £37,750.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Equalcrest Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 13 January 2023
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.