BST-GRD FLR, 10 Little Newport Street, WC2H 7SJ
Shop and premises Decided 30 January 2023 CHG100622020 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the rateable values of two shop properties on Little Newport Street were excessive and should be reduced from £60,500 and £86,500 to £49,750 and £71,000 respectively, based on a zone A rate of £2,300/m². The tribunal found that rental evidence from comparable properties on the same street supported the existing zone A rate of £2,800/m² and that the appellant had not provided sufficient evidence to prove the valuations were excessive. The appeals were dismissed on the balance of probabilities.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Viet Food Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 13 January 2023
Similar decisions
- KIOSK (BTW OXFORD CIRCUS STN EAST EXIT & ARGYLL STREET),, Oxford Street, W1D 2LP — Dismissed, 18 May 2026
- Basement And Ground Floor Part, Alhambra House, 23 -33 Charing Cross Road, 23 -33 Charing Cross Road, WC2H 0AU — Allowed in part, 1 Dec 2025
- Basement And Ground Floor Part, Alhambra House, 23 -33 Charing Cross Road, 23 -33 Charing Cross Road, WC2H 0AU — Allowed in part, 1 Dec 2025
- S Franses, 80 Jermyn Street, SW1Y 6JD — Dismissed, 26 Nov 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.