Tribunals · Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea · 2017 rating list

18 CADOGAN GARDENS, SW3 2RP

Surgery and premises Decided 17 November 2023 CHG100732158 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£372,500£640/m²
Ratepayer sought£277,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£372,500£640/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, a dental practice, challenged the rateable value on the basis of recent rental evidence at £532/m² and comparable surgeries valued at £400-£500/m². The tribunal found that the appeal property should be valued on an office basis as it was capable of such use with minor works. The tribunal accepted rental evidence for nearby office properties on Sloane Street and Lower Sloane Street, set in 2014/2015 and supporting the £640/m² rate applied in the assessment. The panel concluded there was insufficient evidence that the appeal property's use as a dental surgery would achieve a substantially lower rent than office premises, and the appeal was dismissed.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Happy Kids Dental Practice Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
  • mode or category of occupation
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta v Culverwell; Scottish & Newcastle Retail Limited & Allied Domecq Retailing Limited v R F Williams; Williams v Scottish & Newcastle Retail Ltd; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
18 October 2023

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.