18 CADOGAN GARDENS, SW3 2RP
Surgery and premises Decided 17 November 2023 CHG100732158 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, a dental practice, challenged the rateable value on the basis of recent rental evidence at £532/m² and comparable surgeries valued at £400-£500/m². The tribunal found that the appeal property should be valued on an office basis as it was capable of such use with minor works. The tribunal accepted rental evidence for nearby office properties on Sloane Street and Lower Sloane Street, set in 2014/2015 and supporting the £640/m² rate applied in the assessment. The panel concluded there was insufficient evidence that the appeal property's use as a dental surgery would achieve a substantially lower rent than office premises, and the appeal was dismissed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Happy Kids Dental Practice Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Rental evidence
- mode or category of occupation
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus & Delta v Culverwell; Scottish & Newcastle Retail Limited & Allied Domecq Retailing Limited v R F Williams; Williams v Scottish & Newcastle Retail Ltd; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 18 October 2023
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.