Tribunals · City of Westminster · 2017 rating list

Basement And Ground Floor, Garden House, WC2E 9JL

Shop and premises Decided 9 May 2023 CHG100732209 Gerald Eve LLP - CCA

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV£735,000£4100/m²
Ratepayer sought£462,500
VO conceded first£550,000−25% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£462,500£3450/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, a clothing retailer occupying a shop on Long Acre in Covent Garden, challenged the VO's revised assessment of £550,000 RV (Zone A value £4,100 per m²), seeking £462,500 RV (Zone A value £3,450 per m²). The tribunal found that the actual rent passing on the subject property, agreed on a lease renewal three and a half months before the AVD with a nine-month rent-free period analysed as pure incentive, provided the best evidence of value in the absence of an established tone of the list. The tribunal accepted the appellant's analysis of £3,451 per m² ITZA and placed most weight on this rent as it had been fully negotiated and reflected open market rent, allowing the appeal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was All Saints Retail Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence · decisive
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
18 April 2023

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Westminster · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.