26-27 Aybrook Street, W1U 4AN
Accommodation from basement to fourth floor Decided 25 March 2024 CHG100750752 CBRE - William Martin
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued for a 41% reduction in RV to reflect a material change of circumstances caused by construction work opposite the appeal property, citing a rent reduction agreed by the landlord. The tribunal found that while construction work clearly constituted an MCC and the landlord had agreed variable reductions (41% for three years or 25% over five years), the 25% allowance over the lease term reasonably reflected the disturbance. The tribunal was persuaded by the VO's position that the 25% reduction, when annualised over the full lease period, equated to the same benefit as the 41% over three years, and was supported by similar settlements on neighbouring properties.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Working Title Films Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Change of circumstances · decisive
- Rental evidence
- Change of circumstances
- construction works
- Evidence
- Rents, Photographs, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta ltd v Culverwell; Dawkins v Ash Brothers and Heaton Limited; Hostsoho Limited v Jackson; The Occupier v Stauder
- Hearing
- 29 February 2024
Similar decisions
- 4th Flr East 3-5, Burlington Gardens, W1S 3EP — Allowed, 21 Sept 2026
- 6TH FLR 3-5, BURLINGTON GARDENS, W1S 3EP — Allowed, 21 Sept 2026
- Westminster House, 7 Millbank, SW1P 3JA — Allowed in part, 17 Aug 2026
- 18 Cosway Street, NW1 5NR — Dismissed, 19 Jun 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.