Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · City of Westminster · 2023 rating list

4th Flr East 3-5, Burlington Gardens, W1S 3EP

Offices and premises Decided 21 September 2026 CHG101328032 Ryan

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV · 2023 list£285,000
Ratepayer sought£242,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£249,000from 1 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (4TH FLOOR EAST 3-5, BURLINGTON GARDENS, LONDON W1S 3EP). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
4TH FLOOR EAST 3-5, BURLINGTON GARDENS, LONDON W1S 3EPThis appeal£285,000£242,000£249,000Allowed
6TH FLOOR 3-5, BURLINGTON GARDENS, LONDON W1S 3EP£497,500£422,500£437,000Allowed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants challenged the rateable value of two office floors in Burlington Gardens, Mayfair, seeking reductions from £1,000/m² to £850/m² unadjusted rate, arguing the offices were disadvantaged by having a ground-floor restaurant below. The tribunal found the existing assessment of £1,000/m² excessive and adopted £875/m² based on persuasive comparable evidence from 28 Savile Row (nearby offices where the Valuation Officer had agreed to £875/m²) and rental evidence from leases granted close to the antecedent valuation date. The tribunal rejected the further reduction to £850/m² as unsupported by valuation evidence. The appeals were allowed with the tribunal determining revised rateable values of £249,000 (4th Floor East) and £437,000 (6th Floor).

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Salamanca Group Holdings (UK) Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta v Culverwell (VO) and Leicester City Council [1976] RA 141
Hearing
27 August 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Westminster · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.