100 CEDARWOOD, CHINEHAM PARK, RG24 8WD
Offices and premises Decided 3 February 2023 CHG100765996 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the rateable value should be reduced from £83,500 to £66,500, based primarily on the rent agreed on the subject property from June 2015. The tribunal found that the rent passing on the subject property, close to the antecedent valuation date, was the best evidence and should form the starting point for valuation. The tribunal accepted that comparable rents from the same development varied significantly, with one property appearing as an outlier and should be given little weight. The tribunal concluded that a tone of £120/m2 was reasonable, reducing the rateable value to £66,500 with effect from 1 April 2017.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Kuehne and Nagel Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 20 January 2023
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.