Unit 1 At 36 The Mall, Gold Street, NN16 8JA
Bank and Premises Decided 10 June 2024 CHG100767019 Colliers International
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 4 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants argued that the opening and expansion of Rushden Lakes Shopping Centre constituted a material change of circumstances affecting the rateable values of retail units in Kettering and Corby town centres. The tribunal accepted that Rushden Lakes fell within the locality of the Kettering properties and that the evidence supported a 5% allowance for end valuation, which the Valuation Officer had conceded. The Corby appeal was dismissed as the tribunal found insufficient evidence of impact. Three Kettering appeals were allowed in part with a 5% reduction effective 28 June 2019; the Corby appeal was dismissed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Barclays Bank plc, represented.
Grounds argued
- Change of circumstances
- Change of circumstances
- retail park opening and expansion
- Evidence
- Photographs, Expert report
- Cases cited
- K Shoe Shops Ltd v Hardy (VO) and Westminster CC; Morton (VO) v Synor Electronics Ltd; Shearson Lehman Brothers Ltd v Humphreys (VO); Jafton Properties Ltd v Prisk (VO); Merlin Entertainments Group Ltd v Cox (Valuation Officer); GPS v Bird (VO); Gallagher (VO) v Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints; Stena Line Ltd v Valuation Officer; Vistra Expansion and Others v Bunyan (VO); Karen Kendrick (VO)
- Hearing
- 29 May 2024
Similar decisions
- National Westminster Bank Plc, 43 High Street, NN10 0QE — Dismissed, 1 Jul 2024
- Poundland, 8-11 Corn Lane, NN8 1EZ — Allowed, 24 Jun 2024
- 43, Spring Lane, NN8 1EY — Allowed in part, 24 Jun 2024
- 21, Spring Lane, NN8 1EY — Allowed, 24 Jun 2024
All decisions in North Northamptonshire Council · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.