Butts Mill, Butts, BB18 5HP
Factory and premises Decided 6 March 2024 CHG100816516 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought a 10% allowance for poor access and 7% for floor level variations at an industrial property. The tribunal, having regard to comparable properties and the weight-restricted access at the subject property similar to Hope Mill, considered the Valuation Officer's revised allowance of 7.5% for poor access to be reasonable. The tribunal found no sufficient evidence to support maintaining a 7% allowance for floor level variation when no comparable evidence was provided, and dismissed the appeal, confirming the RV at £123,000.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Filtrox Carlson Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Quantum or end allowance · decisive
- Evidence
- Photographs, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC); Barnard & Barnard v Walker (VO) [1975] RA 383
- Hearing
- 7 February 2024
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.