Basement Part To First Floor, 44 Regent Street, W1B 5RA
Shop and premises Decided 8 March 2024 CHG100838337 GL Hearn Limited - Star 2017
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the first floor retail area, which was 'top heavy' with a floor area of 1,021.09 m² compared to the ground floor of 418.67 m², warranted an adjustment to the value relativity from A/8.264 to A/10. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to support this adjustment and held that the 'top heavy' layout did not constitute a disadvantage warranting a discount. The appeal was dismissed and the RV of £2,040,000 (at £6,250 per m² zone A) was upheld.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Boots UK Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- value relativity
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Barnard & Barnard v. Walker
- Hearing
- 15 February 2024
Similar decisions
- KIOSK (BTW OXFORD CIRCUS STN EAST EXIT & ARGYLL STREET),, Oxford Street, W1D 2LP — Dismissed, 18 May 2026
- Basement And Ground Floor Part, Alhambra House, 23 -33 Charing Cross Road, 23 -33 Charing Cross Road, WC2H 0AU — Allowed in part, 1 Dec 2025
- Basement And Ground Floor Part, Alhambra House, 23 -33 Charing Cross Road, 23 -33 Charing Cross Road, WC2H 0AU — Allowed in part, 1 Dec 2025
- S Franses, 80 Jermyn Street, SW1Y 6JD — Dismissed, 26 Nov 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.