Tribunals · London Borough of Wandsworth · 2017 rating list

971 ­973, GARRATT LANE, SW17 0LW

Office and premises Decided 13 June 2025 CHG100893870 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester/Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£37,750£125/m²
Ratepayer sought£30,250
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£37,750£125/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, a funeral parlour operator, challenged the rateable value of £37,750 based on a £125/m² rate, proposing instead £100/m² giving an RV of £30,250. The appellant relied primarily on rental evidence from a 2015 rent review between connected parties (landlord and tenant) with no documentary support. The tribunal found this evidence unreliable due to the connected-party relationship, lack of supporting documentation, and the fact that rental evidence is only a starting point. The comparable properties provided by the Valuation Officer were rejected as being in different locations, substantially smaller, and in different use categories. The tribunal found the appellant failed to prove the current valuation unreasonable and dismissed the appeal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Funeral Partners Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
16 May 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Wandsworth · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.