Tribunals · London Borough of Wandsworth · 2017 rating list

32 Putney High Street, sw15 1sq

Restaurant and premises Decided 20 March 2023 CHG100796207

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—from 25 Sept 2020

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant contended the property was incapable of beneficial occupation from 25 September 2020 due to poor repair (water damage, mould, damp) following tenant departure and should be deleted from the list until repairs completed on 25 March 2021. The tribunal found the property was an empty restaurant in disrepair but not stripped out to a shell condition as in Canary Wharf, therefore the statutory repair assumption applied. The tribunal concluded repair works costing £46,277 were economically justifiable given the property's location and rental potential, and a reasonable landlord would undertake them, so the property remained capable of beneficial occupation at the material date.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • State of repair or deletion · decisive
Change of circumstances
covid
Evidence
Expert report, Photographs
Cases cited
Newbigin (VO) v SJ & J Monk [2017] UKSC 14; Jackson (VO) v Canary Wharf Limited [2019] RA 411; Princes St Ltd (Ipswich) v Bond (VO) [2002]
Hearing
14 February 2023

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Wandsworth · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.