Pumpkin Cafe, Pumpkin Cafe, PE1 1QL
Cafe and premises Decided 5 December 2024 CHG100910105 Tanner Rose - James Massey
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 4 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the rateable values were excessive and should be reduced based on minimum guaranteed rents (MGR) only, contending that top-up payments reflected specific tenant performance rather than open market value. The tribunal found that prospective tenants would consider top-ups when making rental bids, and actual rents paid around the antecedent valuation date (1 April 2015) exceeded the MGR in all cases except one, indicating the MGR alone did not reflect true rental value. The tribunal dismissed the appeals, holding that the appellant failed to persuade the panel that the confirmed values were unreasonable.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Select Service Partner Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents
- Hearing
- 11 November 2024
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.