Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Peterborough City Council · 2017 rating list

Pumpkin Cafe, Pumpkin Cafe, PE1 1QL

Cafe and premises Decided 5 December 2024 CHG100910105 Tanner Rose

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list£95,500
Ratepayer sought£86,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£95,500from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 4 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Pumpkin Cafe, Station Road, Peterborough, PE1 1QL). Every property is listed below.

The 4 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Pumpkin Cafe, Station Road, Peterborough, PE1 1QLThis appeal£95,500£86,000£95,500Dismissed
Pumpkin between Platform 4 and 5, Station Road, Peterborough, PE1 1QL£65,500£60,250£65,500Dismissed
WHSmith, Ticket Hall at Peterborough Station, Peterborough PE1 1QL£64,500£59,000£64,500Dismissed
Unit 1A, Norwich Railway Station, Norwich, NR1 1EG£77,500£72,500£77,500Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the rateable values were excessive and should be reduced based on minimum guaranteed rents (MGR) only, contending that top-up payments reflected specific tenant performance rather than open market value. The tribunal found that prospective tenants would consider top-ups when making rental bids, and actual rents paid around the antecedent valuation date (1 April 2015) exceeded the MGR in all cases except one, indicating the MGR alone did not reflect true rental value. The tribunal dismissed the appeals, holding that the appellant failed to persuade the panel that the confirmed values were unreasonable.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Select Service Partner Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents
Hearing
11 November 2024

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.