33 Jeffreys Road, EN3 7PW
Chemical works and premises Decided 21 February 2025 CHG101050350 Colliers International - Matthew Webb
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought to increase the end allowance for poor layout/fragmentation from 5% to 20%, proposing a revised RV of £1,015,000. The tribunal found that no evidence had been presented to demonstrate that the property's layout had changed from previous rating lists, and was not persuaded by the comparable properties cited as they had been valued on different bases. The tribunal upheld the VO's 5% allowance, considering that seeking a higher end allowance would constitute double-counting of adjustments made in the contractors method valuation.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Johnson Matthey Plc, represented.
Grounds argued
- Quantum or end allowance · decisive
- Evidence
- Settled assessments, Photographs, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
- Hearing
- 29 January 2025
Similar decisions
- 277 Lincoln Road, EN1 1SY — Allowed, 4 Jun 2025
- Unit 1, 102 East Duck Lees Lane, EN3 7SS — Allowed in part, 25 Apr 2025
- Unit 2, 102 East Duck Lees Lane, EN3 7SS — Allowed in part, 25 Apr 2025
- Unit 3, 102 East Duck Lees Lane, EN3 7SS — Allowed in part, 25 Apr 2025
All decisions in London Borough of Enfield · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.