Unit 2, 102 East Duck Lees Lane, EN3 7SS
Warehouse units with offices above Decided 25 April 2025 VT00026540 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited - Alistair Moore/Altus Group - Alistair Moore
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 3 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant company challenged completion notices served by the billing authority on 2 October 2024, proposing completion dates of 9 October 2024, arguing the warehouse units were not complete and could not be completed by those dates. The tribunal found the properties lacked essential fixtures including small power distribution, warehouse lighting, data cabling, and other features necessary for occupation, applying the principle that a building must be 'ready for occupation' to be complete. The tribunal determined that reasonable completion dates should be 2 January 2025 for Units 1 and 2, and 2 April 2025 for Unit 3, allowing three and six months respectively from service for the remaining work to be completed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Segro Lee Park Distribution Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Validity of the proposal
- Evidence
- Photographs, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Newham London Borough Council; Porter (Valuation Officer) v Trustees of Gladman Sipps; Aviva Investors Property Developments Ltd v Whitby (VO)
- Hearing
- 26 March 2025
Similar decisions
- 277 Lincoln Road, EN1 1SY — Allowed, 4 Jun 2025
- Unit 1, 102 East Duck Lees Lane, EN3 7SS — Allowed in part, 25 Apr 2025
- Unit 3, 102 East Duck Lees Lane, EN3 7SS — Allowed in part, 25 Apr 2025
- 33 Jeffreys Road, EN3 7PW — Dismissed, 21 Feb 2025
All decisions in London Borough of Enfield · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.