Tribunals · Babergh District Council · 2017 rating list

Rvm Plumbing & Heating, Unit 9-10, CO10 2XX

Industrial unit and premises Decided 15 February 2024 CHG101054605

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£12,000£50.94/m²
Ratepayer sought£11,000
VO conceded first£11,500−4% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£11,500£46.31/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought to reduce the rateable value from £12,000 to £11,000 by having two former office areas reclassified and revalued at lower rates reflecting their current use as works offices and internal storage. The VO conceded reclassification of the offices as works offices at the workshop rate of £46.31/m2, reducing the RV to £11,500, but maintained that internal storage should be valued at the same rate as the workshop rather than at 50% of that rate. The tribunal found the VO's revised valuation reasonable, noting that the former mezzanine storage was a different type of space and that both former offices had been appropriately valued at the workshop rate with no additional quality premium warranted.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was RVM Plumbing and Heating, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Zoning or layout
  • Valuation method
  • Floor area or measurement
Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Hearing
5 February 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Babergh District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.