Tribunals · Babergh District Council · 2023 rating list

UNIT 9 THE STERLING COMPLEX, SPROUGHTON INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,, SPROUGHTON,, IP1 5AP

Industrial unit and premises Decided 11 September 2025 CHG101289912 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited/Ryan Property Tax Services formerly Altus Group

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£38,750£57.5/m²
Ratepayer sought£31,750
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£33,500£50/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued for a reduction in the rateable value from £38,750 to £31,750 based on comparable rental evidence supporting a lower £/m² rate. The tribunal found that whilst the appellant's representative submitted a more useful basket of evidence with properties closer in size to the appeal property at dates closer to the antecedent valuation date, a rate of £50/m² (rather than the proposed £47.50/m²) was reasonable, resulting in an RV of £33,500. The tribunal gave greater weight to the appellant's evidence than the Valuation Officer's, which was overly dependent on a superior comparator.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Motion Components Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
20 August 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Babergh District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.