Tribunals · City of London Corporation · 2017 rating list

STOREY CLUB, 2ND FLR, 100 LIVERPOOL STREET, EC2M 2AT

Offices and premises Decided 26 March 2025 CHG101058662 Knight Frank - Bjorn Bowles

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV—£600/m²
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—£550/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 14 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued the office building at 100 Liverpool Street should be valued at £515/m2 rather than the Valuation Officer's £600/m2, relying on rental evidence averaging £520/m2 and comparable properties valued at £515/m2 (5 Broadgate) and £535/m2 (20 Gresham Street). The tribunal found the £600/m2 rate excessive and reduced it to £550/m2, as the property's modern specification and proximity to Liverpool Station justified a rate above the nearest comparable (5 Broadgate) but below tower buildings valued at £575/m2. For one first-floor unit with access limitations and lack of natural light, the tribunal applied 5% and 15% allowances respectively.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was British Land T/A Storey, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
3 March 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.