PT 1ST FLR, 100 LIVERPOOL STREET, EC2M 2AT
Office and premises Decided 26 March 2025 CHG101058665 Knight Frank - Bjorn Bowles
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 14 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant contended that the offices should be valued at £515/m2 rather than the Valuation Officer's £600/m2, supported by rental evidence from comparable properties averaging £520/m2 and agreed assessments of nearby buildings such as 5 Broadgate at £515/m2. The tribunal found the VO's rate of £600/m2 excessive and determined that £550/m2 was appropriate, having regard to the newer specification compared to older comparables and the better location relative to 5 Broadgate. For the Part 1st Floor, the tribunal allowed a 5% adjustment for poor access and 15% for lack of natural light, as the space could not be used as standard office accommodation.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was British Land T/A Storey, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 3 March 2025
Similar decisions
- 5 TH FLR 1, BARTHOLOMEW LANE, EC2N 2AX — Dismissed, 10 Sept 2026
- Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Equistone Partners Europe Limited, PT 6TH FLR 60 Ludgate Hill, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Ropes & Gray International Llp, 5th Floor South, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.