Tribunals · Birmingham City Council · 2017 rating list

Car Parking Spaces 99 to 105 at Centre City, 5-7 Hill Street, B5 4UA

Car Parking Spaces Decided 4 December 2024 CHG101063038 Sixteen Real Estate - John Scully

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 20 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the effective date of 20 appeals concerning car parking spaces at Centre City, Birmingham, arguing they should have an effective date of 31 October 2022 (or alternatively 24 January 2022) rather than 1 April 2017. The tribunal found that the car parking spaces existed before 1 April 2017 and were in the control of the appellant, and that in correcting an inaccuracy in the compiled list, the effective date should be from the earliest possible date in the 2017 list (1 April 2017), in accordance with regulation 14(1B). The tribunal dismissed the appeals.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Bruntwood Aviva Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Effective date
  • Split or merge the assessment
Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
BMC Properties and Management Ltd v Jackson (Valuation Officer) [2015] EWCA Civ 1306; Lamb & Shirley Ltd v Bliss (VO) [2001] EWCA Civ 562
Hearing
14 November 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Birmingham City Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.