Tribunals · Birmingham City Council · 2017 rating list

Car Parking Spaces 192 to 202 at Centre City, 5-7 Hill Street, B5 4UA

Car parking spaces Decided 4 December 2024 CHG101063131 Sixteen Real Estate - John Scully

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 20 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the effective date (1 April 2017) of 204 car parking spaces entering the 2017 rating list, arguing they should have entered on 31 October 2022 (when the split was made) or alternatively 24 January 2022 (when the single hereditament first entered). The tribunal found that regulation 14(1B) permits retrospective corrections of list inaccuracies, and since the car parking spaces existed before 1 April 2017, the correct effective date for correction of the compiled list error was 1 April 2017, the start of the 2017 list. The tribunal dismissed the appeals, rejecting arguments that would have unfairly benefited the appellant from the valuation officer's initial error.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Bruntwood Aviva Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Effective date
Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
BMC Properties and Management Ltd v Jackson (Valuation Officer) [2015] EWCA Civ 1306; Lamb & Shirley Ltd v Bliss (VO) [2001] EWCA Civ 562
Hearing
14 November 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Birmingham City Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.