Tribunals · Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council · 2017 rating list

Lookers (Fiat, Kia & Volvo), St Marys Way, SK1 2Hy

Car showroom and premises Decided 20 February 2025 CHG101071492 Knight Frank - Joanne Corney

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£231,000£170/m²
Ratepayer sought£207,000
VO conceded first£225,000−3% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£218,000£160/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the VO's valuation of £231,000 on the 2017 rating list, arguing for £207,000 based on a tone of £160/m² with a 5% quality allowance for poor condition. The tribunal found that comparable properties (Citroen at Reg Vardy and HR Owen both on St Marys Way) supported a base rate of £160/m² and determined the rateable value to be £218,000, allowing the appeal in part by reducing the tone from £165/m² to £160/m² but rejecting the end allowance as the property appeared to be of reasonable quality after 2016 refurbishment.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Lookers (Fiat, Kia & Volvo), represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
3 February 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.