Tribunals · City of London Corporation · 2017 rating list

5TH F 55, OLD BROAD STREET, EC2M 1RX

Offices and premises Decided 19 March 2025 CHG101073819 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited/Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£223,000£420/m²
Ratepayer sought£199,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£223,000£420/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 5 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants argued that the rateable values should be reduced from £420/m2 to £375/m2, relying on analysis of one lease for part 3rd Floor. The Valuation Officer contended that the tone of £420/m2 was supported by a basket of rental evidence, including two leases agreed close to the antecedent valuation date (9th and 10th Floors) which analysed to £518/m2 and £488/m2 respectively. The tribunal found the Valuation Officer's rental evidence compelling and attached significant weight to it, concluding that the £420/m2 tone was fair and reasonable.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was JCW Search Limited, Gb Railfreight Ltd, Finn Partners The Travel Company Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence · decisive
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
25 February 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.