Tribunals · City of London Corporation · 2017 rating list

RM 3.10 AT 3RD FL 80, COLEMAN STREET,, Beaumont Business Centre, EC2R 5BJ

Offices and premises; serviced offices Decided 29 July 2025 CHG101076830 Avison Young (UK) Ltd

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£28,750£395/m²
Ratepayer sought£27,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£27,000£380/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 146 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged 146 rateable values for serviced offices in a multi-unit building, raising grounds of rental evidence, material change of circumstances from building works, and physical disturbance from those works. The parties reached agreement in principle before the hearing but could not calculate all revised values in detail. The tribunal ratified the agreed valuations, reducing the tone from £395/m² to £380/m² and applying a 4% allowance from 1 April 2017 and an additional 4% (8% total) from 14 August 2017 to 14 October 2020 to reflect the building works disturbance.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Beaumont Business Centres Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Change of circumstances
  • Building works or disturbance nearby
Change of circumstances
building works
Evidence
Expert report
Hearing
17 July 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.