Tribunals · City of London Corporation · 2017 rating list

1 Pair 9, King's Bench Walk, EC4Y 7DX

Office and Premises Decided 17 July 2025 CHG101081158 JMA Chartered Surveyors/JMA Chartered Surveyors

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£38,250£400/m²
Ratepayer sought£38,250
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£38,250£380/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 16 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

Appellants challenged the rateable values of 16 barristers' chambers in Victorian and Georgian buildings in Temple, London, proposing lower unadjusted base rates (£350 psm for Victorian, £315 psm for Georgian). The tribunal found the original rates (£400 psm Victorian, £380 psm Georgian) were unreasonable based on rental evidence showing a value differential between building types. The tribunal reduced the base rates to £380 psm for Victorian properties and £360 psm for Georgian properties, reflecting a 5% and 10% reduction respectively. The tribunal dismissed the appellant's claims for an additional fragmentation allowance and upheld the measurement of a disputed area in one property.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was One Essex Court Ltd / Hailsham Chambers / Smyth Barkham LLP / Farrars Building / 3 Doctor Johnsons Buildings / 7 KBW Ltd / Chambers of Simon Davenport QC / Honourable Society of Inner Temple, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Floor area or measurement
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
Hearing
18 June 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.