BST-2 8, King's Bench Walk, EC4Y 7DU
Offices and Premises Decided 17 July 2025 CHG101081800 JMA Chartered Surveyors/JMA Chartered Surveyors
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 16 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants challenged the unadjusted base rate applied to Victorian and Georgian barristers' chambers in Temple, London. The appellant expert argued for rates of £350 psm (Victorian) and £315 psm (Georgian); the VO maintained £400 psm and £380 psm respectively. The tribunal, examining rental evidence for thirteen properties and applying less weight to indexed Inner Temple rents, found a 5-10% differential between property types was supported by the evidence. The tribunal allowed the appeals in part, reducing Victorian properties to £380 psm and Georgian to £360 psm, and dismissed claims for fragmentation allowances and the disputed area measurement.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was One Essex Court Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Floor area or measurement
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Rents, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO)
- Hearing
- 18 June 2025
Similar decisions
- 5 TH FLR 1, BARTHOLOMEW LANE, EC2N 2AX — Dismissed, 10 Sept 2026
- Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Equistone Partners Europe Limited, PT 6TH FLR 60 Ludgate Hill, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Ropes & Gray International Llp, 5th Floor South, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.