BST 4 KINGS BENCH WALK, TEMPLE, EC4Y 7DL
Office and Premises Decided 17 July 2025 CHG101090279 JMA Chartered Surveyors
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 16 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants challenged the rateable values of 16 barristers' chambers in Victorian and Georgian buildings in Temple, London, seeking reductions based on lower unadjusted base rates. The tribunal dismissed the appeal on floor area measurement for one property and on fragmentation allowances, but allowed the appeals in part on the main issue: the tribunal found the original base rates of £400 psm (Victorian) and £380 psm (Georgian) were unreasonable, accepting rental evidence that demonstrated a 5-10% differential between post-war and Victorian/Georgian properties, and thus reduced the base rates to £380 psm and £360 psm respectively.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was One Essex Court Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Floor area or measurement
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 18 June 2025
Similar decisions
- 5 TH FLR 1, BARTHOLOMEW LANE, EC2N 2AX — Dismissed, 10 Sept 2026
- Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Equistone Partners Europe Limited, PT 6TH FLR 60 Ludgate Hill, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Ropes & Gray International Llp, 5th Floor South, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.