Tribunals · Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council · 2017 rating list

ADVERTISING SITE ON BUS SHELTER OPP 53, GAWBER ROAD, S75 2PS

Advertising rights and premises, digital display at bus shelter Decided 14 November 2024 CHG101096191 Montagu Evans - Richard Wackett

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£2,550from 2 Aug 2020

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 21 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that digital advertising displays at bus shelters should be valued using the VOA's scheme for static displays without any uplift for the digital mechanism, citing an absence of reference to digital technology in the statutory definition of "land" for advertising rights. The tribunal found that digital advertising rights would command significantly higher value than static ones due to enhanced exposure and effectiveness, but determined the VO's uplift multiplier of six was excessive and unsubstantiated. The tribunal applied a multiplier of three to the base rates for static displays to reflect the digital aspect, allowing the appeals in part.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Alight Bus Shelter Media Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Valuation method · decisive
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Fir Mill Ltd v Royton UDC; J C Decaux UK Ltd ME v Valuation Officer; Alight Bus Shelter Media Limited v Valuation Officer
Hearing
31 October 2024

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.