11-13 Whitegate Drive, FY3 9AE
Shop and premises Decided 7 November 2024 CHG101102887 Ken Batty Chartered Surveyors - Sara
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought end allowances for masking, fragmentation, and a double unit classification on a shop premises originally entered at £21,750 RV. The tribunal rejected the fragmentation and double-unit allowances due to insufficient evidence and comparable properties on the same road showing no such allowances, but accepted and increased the masking allowance from 5% to 10% across zones A, B and C after examining the floor layout and photographs, extending it to zone C which the VO had disputed. The tribunal determined £21,500 RV was more reasonable.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.
Grounds argued
- Quantum or end allowance
- Evidence
- Photographs, Measurement survey
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO)
- Hearing
- 11 October 2024
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.