RMBC, The Market,, OL16 1EB
Car park and premises Decided 26 March 2025 CHG101120274 Colliers International - Peter William Gould
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant contended that a full income and expenditure approach should be applied to value the multistorey car park, relying on the operator's accounts showing a tone of £57 per parking space and seeking £50,000 RV. The VO argued the method was unreliable due to free parking being provided as an incentive to the shopping centre and non-comparable properties being used as tone evidence. The tribunal determined that a full income and expenditure approach was appropriate as the VO had not demonstrated rental evidence supporting the comparable assessments, and issued directions for further evidence. Following these directions, the parties agreed a revised RV of £60,500 with effect from 1 April 2017, which the tribunal ratified.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was REI Nederland BV, represented.
Grounds argued
- Valuation method · decisive
- Trading receipts (pubs, hotels)
- Evidence
- Trading accounts, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- BNPPDS Limited & BNPPDS Limited (Jersey) as Trustees for Blackrock UK Property Fund [2022] UKUT 129 (LC); Wishart v Hulse (VO) [2018] UKUT 224 (LC); Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
- Hearing
- 14 February 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.