Tribunals · City of London Corporation · 2017 rating list

2nd Flr Room 2.02, 181 Queen Victoria Street, EC4V 4EG

Office and premises (serviced offices) Decided 28 February 2025 CHG101122021 Avison Young (UK) Ltd

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£49,250£450/m²
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£46,500£425/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 47 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the unadjusted base rate of £450 psm for serviced offices at 181 Queen Victoria Street, arguing for £350 psm. The tribunal found the original £450 psm base rate unreasonable based on rental evidence from comparable properties (68 Upper Thames Street, 85 and 128 Queen Victoria Street) and settlement evidence, particularly given the subject building was built in 1890 whereas comparable evidence from 71 Queen Victoria Street (2014 build) was not sufficiently comparable. The tribunal determined the appropriate base rate was £425 psm.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Beaumont Business Centres Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
31 January 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.