Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Wiltshire Council · 2017 rating list

Superbook Unit 1, 17 The Shires, BA14 8AT

Shop and premises Decided 6 February 2025 CHG101129983 Knight Frank

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list£32,500
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—from 27 Feb 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Superbook Unit 1, 17 The Shires, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, BA14 8AT). Every property is listed below.

The 3 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Superbook Unit 1, 17 The Shires, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, BA14 8ATThis appeal£32,500——Dismissed
Carphone Warehouse, Unit 24 The Shires, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, BA14 8AT£29,250——Dismissed
Unit 13, 30 The Shires, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, BA14 8AT£21,500——Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought deletion of three retail units in The Shires shopping centre on grounds that they were incapable of beneficial occupation during a programme of repair works from 27 February 2023, relying on the 'reality principle' from Newbigin v Monk and Jackson v Canary Wharf. The tribunal found the works were repairs typical of landlord refurbishment between tenancies lasting only 30 days, not redevelopment involving strip-out to shell as in the cited cases, and were therefore assumed completed under the statutory hypothesis in Schedule 6 paragraph 2(b) LGFA 1988, rendering the properties capable of beneficial occupation at the material day.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Sheet Anchor Investments Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • State of repair or deletion
Evidence
Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Newbigin (Valuation Officer) v S J & J Monk; Jackson (VO) v Canary Wharf Ltd; Porter (VO) v Trustees of Gladman SIPPS; Aviva Investors v Bunyan (VO)
Hearing
21 January 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Wiltshire Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.