Tribunals · Wiltshire Council · 2017 rating list

11, Emery Gate, SN15 3JP

Shop and premises Decided 30 April 2024 CHG100353032 Alder King - Bristol

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV—£550/m²
Ratepayer sought£22,600
VO conceded first£28,000
Tribunal decided£22,600£400/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable value of a retail unit in Emery Gate Shopping Centre, arguing that the zone A rate of £550/m² (later reduced to £500/m² by the Valuation Officer) was excessive. The appellant proposed £400/m². The tribunal found that new lettings on comparable units at the antecedent valuation date (Units 8, 9, and 14) analysed to £364-£395/m², carrying the most weight. The tribunal rejected the Valuation Officer's argument that a tone at £500/m² was established, finding insufficient compelling evidence to support this. The appeal was allowed, reducing the RV from £28,000 to £22,600 based on a zone A rate of £400/m².

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Lone Eagle Retail Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Arma Hotels Ltd v Dawn Bunyan (VO) [2023] UKUT 00003(LC); Dawn Bunyan (VO) v Acenden Ltd [2023] UKUT 17(LC); Lotus and Delta v Culverwell (VO) and Leicester City Council [1976] RA 141; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
Hearing
9 April 2023

Similar decisions

All decisions in Wiltshire Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.