3rd F Paternoster House, 65, St Pauls Churchyard, EC4M 8AB
Offices and premises Decided 9 July 2025 CHG101151419 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester/Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant company argued that oversupply in the City of London office market following significant new developments constituted a material change of circumstances that should reduce the rateable value by at least 5%. The tribunal found that while a substantial increase in office supply (8.61% between 2017 and 2022) was undisputed, no substantive evidence was submitted to show this had affected the property's hypothetical rental value. In particular, vacancy rates had risen only 2.8% despite the large increase in supply, and the appellant provided no rental evidence to support its claim, relying instead on valuer intuition and list-on-list comparisons between different rating years affected by Brexit and the pandemic. The appeal was dismissed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Lubbock Fine (UK) Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Change of circumstances · decisive
- Change of circumstances
- oversupply
- Evidence
- Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- Canary Wharf Ltd v Dunlevey (VO) [2014] VTE 590016555047/058 (NV05); Barclays Bank & Poundland v Jo Moore (VO) [2024] VTE CHG100884839 (NV17)
- Hearing
- 2 July 2025
Similar decisions
- 5 TH FLR 1, BARTHOLOMEW LANE, EC2N 2AX — Dismissed, 10 Sept 2026
- Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Equistone Partners Europe Limited, PT 6TH FLR 60 Ludgate Hill, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Ropes & Gray International Llp, 5th Floor South, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.