Tribunals · North Hertfordshire District Council · 2017 rating list

Unit C, Fourth Dimension, SG6 2TD

Warehouse and premises Decided 25 September 2025 CHG101153400

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£111,000£55/m²
Ratepayer sought£95,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£111,000£55/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a reduction in the rateable value of a purpose-built industrial warehouse from £111,000 (£55/m²) to £95,500 (£47.50/m²), arguing the property warranted a lower rate due to the tenant's obligation to carry out substantial remedial works and restore the property at the end of the lease. The tribunal found the comparable assessment evidence from the Valuation Officer, particularly the property on the same industrial site assessed at the same £55/m² rate, more persuasive than the appellant's comparables which were in different schemes or had different characteristics. The tribunal determined that the £55/m² rate was not unreasonable given the property's age, location and eaves height relative to the comparables cited.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Optimal Technologies Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
Hearing
29 August 2025

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.