Tribunals · East Riding of Yorkshire Council · 2023 rating list

The Apollo, 24 Prince Street, YO15 2NW

Public House and Premises Decided 16 September 2024 CHG101180907 Chris Wright

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£90,000
Ratepayer sought£53,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£90,000

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the RV of £90,000, arguing the VOA failed to properly calculate fair maintainable trade (FMT) and seeking reduction to £53,000. The tribunal found the property was correctly valued under the Public Houses Approved Guide 2023 using actual trade evidence from the appellant, with a COVID-19 adjustment applied. The tribunal dismissed the comparable property argument, noting the appellant provided insufficient evidence about them and that actual trade evidence was available and should be the starting point. The appeal was dismissed and the RV of £90,000 confirmed.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was The Apollo, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Trading receipts (pubs, hotels)
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Trading accounts, Settled assessments
Cases cited
JD Wetherspoon PLC v Day (VO) [2008] RA 129; Watney Mann Ltd v Langley (VO) [QB 1963]
Hearing
20 August 2024

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.