Tribunals · Cheshire West and Chester Council · 2023 rating list

MITRAS AUTOMOTIVE (UK) LTD, ROAD ONE, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, CW7 3QP

Factory and premises Decided 9 February 2026 CHG101200647 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£262,500
Ratepayer sought£243,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£262,500from 1 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought to carry forward a 7.5% end allowance for the building's long narrow shape from the 2010 and 2017 lists into the 2023 list, citing a presumption that such allowances should continue. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the allowance, noting that the appellant produced only 4 comparable properties with allowances out of 55 in the same scheme, the comparable properties with allowances had lower percentages (5%), and the valuation officer's evidence from 19 similar properties in the locality, none carrying end allowances, supported the unadjusted rate. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming the RV of £262,500.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Mitras Automotive (UK) Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Quantum or end allowance · decisive
Evidence
Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Barnard and Barnard v Walker; Lamb v Minards
Hearing
23 January 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in Cheshire West and Chester Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.