Tribunals · Cheshire West and Chester Council · 2023 rating list

UNIT 3 PREMIER PARK 35, ROAD ONE,, CW7 3PH

Factory and premises Decided 29 January 2026 CHG101260883 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£81,500£36/m²
Ratepayer sought£62,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£81,500£36/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the £81,500 RV (£36/m2) seeking a reduction to £62,000 (£27.50/m2) based on the appeal property's nil-increase rent review of £58,950 per annum (£25.98/m2). The tribunal found the appeal property's rent was agreed seven months prior to the antecedent valuation date and was not an open market rent, reducing its persuasiveness. The tribunal accepted comparable rental evidence from similar local properties (Units 8 and 9 Nat Lane Business Park at £36.51/m2, Units 1 and 15 Premier Park at £36.07/m2, and Unit 6 Smokehall Lane at £50.86/m2) which supported the £36/m2 valuation, and dismissed the appeal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Premier Image Services Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta Ltd v Culverwell
Hearing
5 January 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in Cheshire West and Chester Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.