UNIT 3 PREMIER PARK 35, ROAD ONE,, CW7 3PH
Factory and premises Decided 29 January 2026 CHG101260883 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the £81,500 RV (£36/m2) seeking a reduction to £62,000 (£27.50/m2) based on the appeal property's nil-increase rent review of £58,950 per annum (£25.98/m2). The tribunal found the appeal property's rent was agreed seven months prior to the antecedent valuation date and was not an open market rent, reducing its persuasiveness. The tribunal accepted comparable rental evidence from similar local properties (Units 8 and 9 Nat Lane Business Park at £36.51/m2, Units 1 and 15 Premier Park at £36.07/m2, and Unit 6 Smokehall Lane at £50.86/m2) which supported the £36/m2 valuation, and dismissed the appeal.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Premier Image Services Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta Ltd v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 5 January 2026
Similar decisions
- MITRAS AUTOMOTIVE (UK) LTD, ROAD ONE, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, CW7 3QP — Dismissed, 9 Feb 2026
- Northern Case Supplies Ltd, Cromwell Road, CH65 4AA — Allowed in part, 31 Dec 2025
- Hatton Heath Mill, Platts Lane, Hatton Heath, CH3 9AN — Allowed, 21 Nov 2025
- UNIT 9, PINEAPPLE PARK, ROAD ONE, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, CW7 3PR — Allowed in part, 14 Oct 2024
All decisions in Cheshire West and Chester Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.