Tribunals · Great Yarmouth Borough Council · 2023 rating list

TOPPS TILES, PASTEUR ROAD, NR31 0DW

Retail warehouse and premises Decided 10 January 2025 CHG101224858 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£85,500£137.5/m²
Ratepayer sought£71,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£77,500£125/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable value on the basis that the tone applied per m² was excessive. The tribunal found the original rate of £137.50/m² was unreasonable by considering the subject property's actual rent (£126/m²), comparable rental evidence at Purley Court, and comparable assessments such as Bennetts (£95/m²) and Matalan (£82.50/m²). The tribunal determined a rate of £125/m² was reasonable, reducing the RV to £77,500.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Topps Tiles PLC, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
17 December 2024

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.