UNITS D E & F BOALLOY SITE, RADNOR PARK INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, CW12 4XJ
Workshop and premises Decided 19 May 2026 CHG101232399 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that two 5% end allowances for split/divided accommodation and inefficient layout should apply to the workshop and premises, reducing the RV from £108,000 to £97,500. The tribunal found that the physical disadvantages persisted from previous lists and would impact a hypothetical tenant's bid, and that the respondent's rental evidence post-dated the valuation date and included additional accommodation, making it unreliable for determining whether disadvantages were already reflected in the adopted tone. The appeal was allowed as the tribunal was satisfied that removal of the allowances was inconsistent with established rating principles.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was CAMBI UK LIMITED, represented.
Grounds argued
- Quantum or end allowance · decisive
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Rents, Photographs, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- Barnard & Barnard v Walker (VO) (1975) RA 383; Lamb v Minards (VO) (1974) RA 153; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
- Hearing
- 20 April 2026
Similar decisions
- UNITS G2 G4, REDWOOD COURT, SPRINGWOOD WAY, SPRINGWOOD WAY, SK10 2XA — Allowed, 11 Feb 2026
- BAY 3 UNIT B, RADNOR PARK INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, CW12 4XJ — Allowed, 29 Feb 2024
- TESCO Distribution Centre Pochin Way, CW10 0TE — Dismissed, 1 Aug 2023
All decisions in Cheshire East Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.