Tribunals · London Borough of Enfield · 2023 rating list

107 High Street, PE30 1DW

Bank and premises Decided 11 June 2026 CHG101337311

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£11,500
Ratepayer sought£0
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£11,500from 29 Nov 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, owner of a vacant pre-1900s three-storey building previously occupied by Barclays Bank and then a charity, sought deletion from the rating list on grounds of severe disrepair and uneconomic repair costs. The Tribunal found that while the property was in poor condition, the repairs identified and costed by the appellant (totalling £33,500 when limited to genuine repairs) did not exceed five times the rateable value of £11,500, and therefore were not uneconomic under the statutory test. The property remained capable of beneficial occupation and the appeal was dismissed.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • State of repair or deletion · decisive
Evidence
Expert report, Measurement survey
Cases cited
Princes Street Ltd (Ipswich) v Bond (VO)
Hearing
15 May 2026

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.