55 Springfield Road, UB4 0LP
Film studio and premises Decided 16 May 2025 VT00025545 Mr Yogish Patel
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant appealed against a completion notice proposing 1 September 2024 as the completion date for a large film studio, arguing the property could not be completed by then due to various defects including electrical fires, lack of heating, incomplete offices, and lack of building control sign-off. The tribunal found the property was structurally complete, watertight, and substantially finished based on photographs showing installed pipes, windows, doors, suspended ceilings, and lighting, concluding that remaining issues were minor snagging items that could be completed within the three-month statutory period. The appeal was dismissed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.
Grounds argued
- Validity of the proposal
- Evidence
- Photographs, None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Mr L Wyatt v Breckland District Council; D & J Developments Ltd v North Warwickshire Borough Council; RGM Properties Ltd v Anthony Speight (Listing Officer) HMRC
- Hearing
- 17 April 2025
Similar decisions
- Sites South East And North East, Cardinal Point, TW6 2SN — Allowed in part, 11 Sept 2024
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.