60-70 Middlewood Road, S6 4HA
Decided 21 March 2023 25164706 CBRE - London
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to appear or be represented at the hearing and failed to submit a statement of case as required by the tribunal's standard directions. With no substantive argument presented disputing the rateable value, the tribunal was satisfied that the entry in the 2010 rating list was correct.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- 9 The Gallery, Meadowhall Centre, S9 1ER — Agreed at hearing, 16 Jun 2026
- 41 -44, Park Lane,, Meadowhall Centre,, S9 1EL — Allowed in part, 1 May 2026
- 48 B & 49, High Street,, Meadowhall Centre,, S9 1EN — Allowed, 23 Apr 2026
- The Francis Newton, 7 Clarkehouse Road, S10 2LA — Dismissed, 20 Oct 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.