1 Acklam Road, Cleveland, Cleveland, TS5 5AY
Decided 3 March 2023 25313519 Paul Yates & Associates
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to appear or be represented at the hearing and did not submit a statement of case. The Valuation Officer submitted that there was no case to answer. The tribunal dismissed the appeal on the grounds of the appellant's serious procedural failure and absence of substantive arguments disputing the rateable value.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- Unit B, Vertex, Grange Road, Grange Road, TS1 2LR — Allowed in part, 19 Jun 2026
- Unit C, Vertex, Grange Road, Grange Road, TS1 2LR — Allowed in part, 19 Jun 2026
- Unit D, Vertex, Grange Road, Grange Road, TS1 2LR — Allowed in part, 19 Jun 2026
- Unit A, Vertex, Grange Road, Grange Road, TS1 2LR — Allowed in part, 19 Jun 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.