Tribunals · Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

Atm At 158a-160, High Street, Princes End, Princes End, DY4 9JA

Decided 24 May 2022 25340667 Cooke & Arkwright - Rating

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appeal concerned an ATM list entry that was one of several hundred similar appeals stayed pending the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following that judgment, the Valuation Officer undertook list maintenance and considered this appeal redundant following amendment/deletion and discussions with interested parties. The tribunal dismissed the appeal as the appellant did not appear, was not represented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Validity of the proposal
Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes (VO) and Others [2020] UKSC 21

Similar decisions

All decisions in Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.