Atm At 180, Birmingham Road, B70 6QG
Decided 24 May 2022 25490745 CBRE - London
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
Following the Supreme Court judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes, the tribunal lifted its stay on multiple ATM-related appeals. The Valuation Officer undertook list maintenance and identified this appeal as redundant due to multiple appeals being lodged against the same list entry. As the appellant did not appear or provide evidence of an arguable case, the tribunal dismissed the appeal.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Validity of the proposal
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes
Similar decisions
- Atm At 158a-160, High Street, Princes End, Princes End, DY4 9JA — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
- Atm At 180, Birmingham Road, B70 6QG — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.