Automatic Telling Machine 255, High Street, GU1 3BJ
Decided 24 May 2022 25405136 CBRE - London
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
This was one of numerous ATM-related appeals previously stayed pending the Supreme Court's decision in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following that judgment, the Valuation Officer undertook a list maintenance exercise and determined this appeal was redundant. The appellant did not appear or provide evidence of an arguable case, and the appeal was dismissed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes
Similar decisions
- Automatic Telling Machine 255, High Street, GU1 3BJ — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.